Docs
Kinetiq Docs
Kinetiq is intentionally simple. The quickest path is to start with a real constraint and force a shortlist.
The core value
Choose based on constraints, not hype.
Kinetiq replaces open-ended searching with structured discovery.
Ask AI Matchmaker
Describe your needs in plain English and get recommendations with a fit score, plus alternatives worth considering.
Structured comparisons
Compare candidates across dimensions that matter in practice, not marketing checklists.
The goal is not to crown a winner. It is to leave you with a decision you can defend.
Try the workflow (60 seconds)
- Open Ask AI Matchmaker and describe your constraints.
- Skim the Why this fits reasoning and the trade-offs.
- Move your top two into Compare and make the call.
A clean decision beats an endless search.
What Kinetiq helps with
Discovery
Browse a broad catalog without getting lost in AI slop.
Filtering
Narrow by hard constraints like pricing, ratings, and growth signals.
Shortlisting
Go from "I have a problem" to "here are three real options" fast.
The Matchmaker workflow
- Describe the need. Write it like a human: "I need X for Y situation."
- Add hard constraints. Budget, privacy requirements, deployment preferences, integrations.
- Review the fit reasoning. Treat the fit score as a heuristic and read the explanation.
- Shortlist 2-3 candidates. More than three recreates analysis paralysis.
The Comparison workflow
- Select your shortlist. Keep it small.
- Compare side-by-side. Look for differences that affect your workflow.
- Name the trade-off. Flexibility vs. simplicity, control vs. speed, breadth vs. depth.
- Decide and move on. A defensible decision beats a perfect decision that never happens.
Interpreting signals (without fooling yourself)
In fast-moving ecosystems, data is noisy. Kinetiq makes signals usable without pretending they are truth.
Good ways to use signals
- Narrowing aid: filter out low-momentum options.
- Outlier detector: "high growth, low rating" is a prompt to investigate.
- Shared language: align a team on the reason behind a choice.
Bad ways to use signals
- Treating any single metric as a winner-picker.
- Assuming the fit score is "correct" without reading the reasoning.
- Making a decision without naming trade-offs.
Examples you can paste into Matchmaker
- "I need an AI coding assistant for a small team, strong Python support, and tight editor integration."
- "I need a writing utility that can handle long documents with citations and a calm interface."
- "I need a support utility that can draft responses, summarize tickets, and integrate with common systems."
Exporting and sharing
Use exports when you need to:
- Share a shortlist with teammates.
- Capture trade-offs for a decision record.
- Revisit a choice later without restarting research.
The goal is not just to choose. It is to remember why you chose.